Leaders Styles

Leaders Styles:

I see that there were different types of leaders but I choose 5 of them as shown in the image below:

Autocratic Leaders:

Autocratic leaders are an excessive form of transactional leadership, where a leader makes use of high levels of power over his team members. People within the team are given few opportunities for making suggestions, even if these would be in the team's or organizations interest.

Bureaucratic Leaders:

Bureaucratic leaders work by the book, ensuring that their staffs follow procedures accurately. This is a very right approach for work involving serious safety risks (such as working with machinery, with toxic substances or at heights) or where large sums of money are involved (such as cash-process).

Charismatic Leaders:

A charismatic leaders style can appear similar to a transformational leadership style, in that the leader bring in huge doses of enthusiasm into his team, and is very energetic in driving others forward. Charismatic leadership carries great responsibility, and needs long-term commitment from the leader.

Democratic Leaders:

Even though a democratic leader will make the final decision, he invites other members of the team to contribute to the decision-making process. This not only increases job satisfaction by involving team members in what is going on, but it also helps to develop people’s skills. Team members feel in control of their own destiny, and are motivated to work smart by more than just a pecuniary reward.

Laissez-Faire Leaders:

They known as delegative leaders offer little or no guidance to group members and leave decision-making up to group members. While this style can be effective in situations where group members are highly qualified in an area of expertise, it often leads to poorly defined roles and a lack of motivation.

As the perfect leader had the most known 3 styles as he play the role of each type in situation he face as below:

Leaders and Defeatism

Leaders and defeatism, one of the troubles encountered by the leaders as the staff are the foundations of the existence of this problem.

The leaders’ interacts with this problem, thinking how to motivate employees, to enhance resilience to step up the organizations forward to the summit.

Motives and incentives is the most important tools that help leaders advancement, but the employee with negative aspect and gives a lot of defeatism will remain is driven because he looks discourteous that this is not a suitable position for him, the employee doesn’t grasp the situation at all due to his egotistical, selfish behavior  and not care about the place, people, .....,etc.

Leaders in this case must be the leaders of authoritarian power* and take a decision to keep this kind of staff away from the surroundings as their influences will undermine all affirmative movement.

Defeatism in the current crisis not required, in any organization need resilience employees and optimistic and expect that future will come by best for them if they provide the leaders and organizations by quality of products or service, increasing revenue, enhancing organization vision and its values.
                                     
* I’ll discuss in a blog the authoritarian leaders